BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:Linklings LLC
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Denver
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Denver
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
TZNAME:MDT
DTSTART:19700308T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0600
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:MST
DTSTART:19701101T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260422T000713Z
LOCATION:503-504
DTSTART;TZID=America/Denver:20231114T110000
DTEND;TZID=America/Denver:20231114T113000
UID:submissions.supercomputing.org_SC23_sess248_exforum132@linklings.com
SUMMARY:Composability in HPC:  A User’s View from the Trenches
DESCRIPTION:Matt Demas (GigaIO) and Brad Hillis (Oak Ridge National Labora
 tory (ORNL))\n\nAfter our very lively panel last year at SC22, “Smackdown:
  Does HPC Need Composability Now?", where 40% of attendees agreed with the
  premise, and over 50% of attendees noted it was either “quite” or “extrem
 ely” relevant to the problems they are currently trying to solve, we are f
 ollowing up this year with a user perspective from the trenches.\n\nWhile 
 composable vendors literally promise the impossible — between “impossible 
 servers” and “software-defined hardware” — the reality of implementing the
 se systems in the wild can be sobering, despite promising many benefits fo
 r the HPC user.\n\nIn this talk, Sean Taylor will share his perspective as
  a Senior Linux HPC Engineer at Oak Ridge National Laboratory after having
  evaluated, deployed, dismantled, and ultimately adopted various composabl
 e systems.\n\nThis technical deep dive will parse out scenarios where comp
 osable solutions work well vs. others where it is merely helpful, and will
  outline the challenges of implementation. Sean will break down key factor
 s potential users need to consider in order to take advantage of what comp
 osability offers without falling into its pitfalls.\n\nParticular detail w
 ill be paid to the key benefits of a composable vs. static architecture, n
 otably the fact the nodes are nondeterministic and malleable and configure
 d based on job need, which in ORNL’s experience affords “the most efficien
 t use of resources and substantially better cluster efficacy.”\n\nTag: Arc
 hitecture and Networks, Cloud Computing\n\nRegistration Category: Tech Pro
 gram Reg Pass, Exhibits Reg Pass\n\nSession Chair: Jane Herriman (Lawrence
  Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL))\n\n
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
